Tell Me, Could Barbarella Do Better Than Yours Truly?

Barbarella said she would do anything if she and the Imaginary Marty could get back together. But, she is being totally unrealistic - hoping, wishing and waiting for something that will never happen.

What a handsome couple we would make. Just feast your eyes on the composite photo! We even look alike. Of course, I look a little younger but that's OK. "Mature" women are just the best.

That's the kind of couple that's needed to wrestle the Church of Scientology away from the present mismanagment. Barbarella could see to it that Scientology Tech is pure Hubbard. I could see to it that Christianity is included. It would be a win-win situation.

Instead of pining away for some imaginary man, she should get real and embrace a loving real man such as yours truly and become his willing helpmate. She just doesn't know what she's missing. She has no idea.

I can fix bicycle flat tires with the best of them. I can do it with my eyes closed or in my sleep, it's so easy. I am a mechanical genius who would not forget to put the brakes back in the right position. I would know how precious the rider and that she should not get in an accident.  I don't want a single scratch to mar her natural beauty.

I hate to say it but Barbarella's idea of getting solid rubber tires is dumb. Solid rubber tires are heavy, they have high rolling resistance so they are slow. And, why does Barbarella accept gifts of tools from Baby Bro and she insults me by refusing my offer of a gift of a Kindle! 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Out with the old, in with the new.  The Imaginary Marty Rathbun has got to GO!  He's ruining everything.  He's a jailbird, for Pete's sake. A common criminal. Why is it  some women fall in love with convicts? But, an imaginary convict??? Can't even write letters to such a person.

Anonymous Seems to be Getting Smarter

I do believe Anonymous might be growing up. It seems like they've decided to be a little less in-your-face and a little more into the business of spreading information - information that can be found everywhere that casts Scientology in a bad light.

I've never been for in-your-face intimidation and street demonstrators wearing masks because I think such tactics do more harm than good. In today's world with the Internet and sites like YouTube where videos of former Scientologists talking out calmly and sanely against the horrible abuses of Scientology can be used, street demonstrations are probably counterproductive and, more often than not, paint the demonstrators as the bad guys.

Members of any religion - even crank religions like Scientology should be free from harrassment in public and members should not be the specific target of organized protests. Protests should target Scientology management whenever possible. In the United States, at least, freedom of religion means freedom of religion for every religion.

I would like to see some activism group working through the courts and legislature to try to remove Scientology's tax exempt status. This would say very loudly and clearly that Scientology is no religion. This would subject them to being regulated and taxed as the business they are. But, as long as Scientology is considered a church by the powers that be then we need to respect their right to freedom of religion.

But, that doesn't mean all their misconduct should be allowed to continue or be swept under the rug. If the Pope's misdeeds can be exposed then so should David Miscavige's.

Here is a fitting new cross for Scientology. I think Scientology blasphemes the Christian cross because of Hubbard's belittling of Jesus Christ and calling Him names. Scientology is anathema to the cross.

Note the presence of Nazi wings signifying suppression, slavery and death. Attend the serpents which represent poison and Satan. Heed the screw which represents what Scientology does to many members, past and present.


I've been viewing many YouTube, Scientology, exposé videos and now understand some of the evils of Scientology better and learned how well-meaning but gullible folks were recruited and then abused or taken advantage of. Much that Scientology does, as told by these former members, is downright criminal. I wonder why there are not more lawsuits?  I wonder how long an ignorant, mean-spirited bully and false man like Miscavige can continue to get away with his abuses. (Some would call them crimes against humanity and human dignity.)

Barbarella Schwartz is Wayward Beyond Redemption! She Prefers Imaginary Men.

http://angryrepublicanmom.blogspot.com/2005/12/liberal-men-vs-conservative-men.html

Poor Barbarella Schwartz. She's Scientology personified. In liberal fashion, she tries hard to act like a man and therefore she causes herself to lack the ultimate female quality - that of being feminine.

**********************

"For a woman qua woman, the essence of femininity is
hero-worship-the desire to look up to man. "To look up" does not mean dependence, obedience or anything implying inferiority. It means an intense kind of admiration; and admiration is an emotion that can be experienced only by a person of strong character and
independent value-judgments. A "clinging vine" type of woman is not an admirer, but an exploiter of men. Hero-worship is a demanding virtue: a woman has to be worthy of it and of the hero she worships. Intellectually and morally, i.e., as a human being, she has to be his equal; then the object of her worship is specifically his masculinity, not any human virtue she might lack.

"This does not mean that a feminine woman feels or projects
hero-worship for any and every individual man; as human beings,
many of them may, in fact, be her inferiors. Her worship is an
abstract emotion for the metaphysical concept of masculinity as
such-which she experiences fully and concretely only for the man
she loves, but which colors her attitude toward all men. This does
not mean that there is a romantic or sexual intention in her attitude
toward all men; quite the contrary: the higher her view of
masculinity, the more severely demanding her standards.
It means that she never loses the awareness of her own sexual
identity and theirs. It means that a properly feminine
woman does not treat men as if she were their pal, sister,
mother-or leader." -- Ayn Rand

*********************

1) Barbarella has stated that the only relationship she wants with a man is to be like a sister. Yes, it's so. This means Barbarella is NOT properly feminine.

2) "To look up to a man" - this means a REAL man not some
silent poltergeist personified like L. Ron Hubbard not some imaginary man like "the real Marty Rathbun" nor any other LIBERAL man which is synonymous with "girly-man" who is no more real than the enturbulator on my bicycle.  

3) She's a clinging-vine type of woman described above when
it comes to her imaginary man. She gushes on and on in her Blog (see sidebar) about how she is a slave to her desires of the flesh with the imaginary MR.

4) Scientology has warped Barbarella's thinking to such an extent
that she's become perfidious, she lacks perspicacity, she has no
understanding of raillery, she doesn't seem to understand what
an arrant religion Scientology is, she's inurbane, she lacks courage
so she flounced off the ARS stage, she's hardly a woman but
rather is a contumacious child as obstreperous as they come.

5) I would gladly take her over my knee and spank some sense into her like Ron or her mother failed to do a long time ago when she was in her formative years lest she become wayward beyond redemption.

But, she's an adult now so look what she needs.

--
Gregory Hall

Babbles and the Babble Rabble

I'm writing this post purely in the spirit of uplifting and sharing.
As corny and dated as these sentiments may sound in the
fast-moving and ever-evolving modern world in which we live,
it's still no less true. Primarily, I want to share with you my view
that whenever Babbles Schwartz wants to show us a gross abuse
of common sense and intelligence, she merely yanks her own
Scientology-supplied puppet strings and out pops ludicrous
postulate after dumb statement usually of a conspiratorial nature
with the finger pointing at SMEGMAPMS, case officers and ear
implants. The uplifting core of what I will say here is that it would
be great if we could debunk the nonsense spouted by Babbles'
Scientology brainwashed mind but we should not hold our
collective breath. She's so recalcitrant. If we can debunk,
then perhaps we can open people's eyes to a vision of how to
oppose Babbles and the Babble Rabble and all the delusions
they stand for.

The struggle against Scientology sycophants must be a struggle against 'technology'' that is anything but, slavery that indeed is, and corruption that must ever wax or it is doomed to failure.  Everybody knows that Babbles' continuous and deliberate misuse of the word
"doppelganger" in an attempt to promote herself as a victim and  her subsequent failure to live up to her potential is just a side-stepping cop-out. This is so ludicrous as Babbles often compares herself to God and Jesus, usually on the grounds that she has little or no understanding of a conventional, Christian god but substitutes a false Scientology god for reason.

Babbles maintains that either the Universe belongs to her dubious religion by right or that the best way to reduce opposition is to 'clear' the world. Is she such a drone that she can't understand that 'clearing' is concocting a version of reality that fully contradicts real life. L. Ron Hubbard's 'tech' is blasphemy gone wild. It's a type of insanity engaged in by willing dupes with defective minds. Babbles denies any possibilities other than her Scientology-taught delusions. Quick, somebody show some compassion and send somebody to reprogram her! (just kiddin') She needs to be reprogrammed because all she does entails making unfounded statements and jumping to daffy conclusions. Her posting and blogging history offers innumerable examples of the veracity of this assertion.

Currently, Babbles elevator won't go to the top floor. From the perspective of those inside her so-called church, truth is whatever LRH's 'tech' says it is. The reality, however, is that Babbles is confused and highly disoriented, when it comes to truth. She and
other Scientologists put forth the STUPID postulate that truth is defined as YOUR truth. In other words, say a lie enough times and it becomes your truth. How absurd! This one example, alone, is the main reason why Babbles' Blogs and postings are so
laughable. I have to laugh because bastardizing the meaning of the word truth just so people can be easily manipulated is so Orwellian. But, brainwashed Scientology members can't even see that they are brainwashed.

How can Babbles call herself sane when she operates under insane rules and word definitions? I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Babbles' hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now from all Scientologists. They just can't help themselves.

I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry,
I can say that Babbles seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of
the Capgras delusion. I contend that Scientology 'tech' is the
primary cause. It creates paranoia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capgras_delusion

I don't say this to judge but merely to put Babbles' depraved histrionics into perspective. In a previous posting, I announced my intention to see that she sticks to her promise to not post to ARS any more as long as I am posting here. She's already broken that promise at least once using her Google account and I'm confident she is the author of many a disparaging anonymous remailer posting about yours truly. So, she's a proven liar. (But, isn't that the case for ALL Scientologists?)

Naturally, this announcement will cause Babbles to plaster
libelous abuses about me on her blog as she has done repeatedly
in the past. Incidents like this truly demonstrate how all she
really wants is to torment me and reject me thinking it will make
me go nuts because she'd rather have an imaginary marriage
with an imaginary man (who looks like a pencil-necked geek)
than do the right and smart thing and become worthwhile as a
helpmate. She's a cruel and relentless dominatrix.


More often than not, Babbles is good at stirring her intimates into a frenzied lunacy of hatred and vengeance. That's the game she's playing with me. She would like nothing better than have me arrested and tossed into prison where daily torture was the norm. I think this is what happened to the original Marty Rathbun. Babbles got him arrested and imprisoned and she's built herself the perfect alibi by claiming she's married to him and loves him forever and all that jazz!

In actuality, a real man, for Babbles, is a mere optional extra and if that man won't cower and shake in fear at her feet like a whipped dog she'll have none of it.

--
Gregory Hall

Where the Anti-Scientology Women Go Astray

Today's woman is so immoral because she has fallen away from Christian ethics and morals.

Our own Dalin (alt.fiftyplus) is a good example of whom I speak. She fancies herself a Christian but she puts herself and her sisters on an even playing field with Jesus Christ. She claims Jesus, when He walked this Earth, saw and treated women as equals when nothing could be further from the truth. It is plain that Satan is speaking through Dalin's mouth when she makes such absurd claims.

But, Dalin and her ilk are hardly in much of a position to even know what morality and ethics are because of how Western society has brainwashed them. Here is a morality line with Christian morality and ethics on the left (represented by J for Jesus) and outright Satanism on the right represented by S for Satan

|J|___________________________________!_____|S|

The exclamation point represents the current state
of Christianity in the United States. Too many
so-called Christians are making up their own rules
on the fly, ignoring the teachings of God as spelled
out in the Bible and generally taking a 'pick and choose'
outlook on the tenets of Christianity. Cafeteria
Christianity, as it is sometimes called.

Among the more important tenets of Christianity is the
fact, yes I said FACT, that women and men were not
created as equals according to the word of God. Nay,
women were created as an afterthought, a helpmate to Adam
who was created first and foremost and in God's image.

NEVER in the Bible is this basic tenet refuted or changed. Not in the Old Testament (sometimes referred to as "the Law")and not in the New Testament. It is what it is in the Book of Genesis. Women who call themselves Christians need to stop trying to rewrite the Bible to suit their American feminist agenda. It's arrogant, dysfunctional, perverted, counterproductive and sinful.

Now, I realize, full well, that this sounds VERY radical
to most people but look at the morality line above once
again. Consider the fact that the point of reference here
in the USA is the exclamation point way over on the Satan
side of morality and you might get some idea why my
traditional morality sounds so extreme to you. Well,
my traditional morality is NOT extreme in any way. It is
the word of God as my reference point, the Bible, is the
word of God.

Most liberated women are nothing more than Satan's little  helpers and, as a Christian, it is my duty to oppose such soul and society destroying behavior.







--
Gregory Hall

Those Who Live in Glass Houses . . .

Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how uncouth Shirley and Kat are? How about this: Shirley and Kat are a couple of inchoately ridiculous femiNazis who quote the Bible but never read it, much less understand it, nor are they Christians. Both are too anti-religion-in-general to commit to a religion. Both also act as if they are morally superior by virtue (more like lack thereof) of the fact that their 'feelings' trump their logic. When discussing Shirley and Kat I think of one word (excrement) in place of another word (censored) which is now apparently permitted in Usenet posts but which I often edit out as profanity is as unnecessary and offensive as the two women this post addresses.

At the core of Shirley and Kat's anti-Scientology diatribes is
insecurity. These are two very insecure women. They absolutely
hate the fact that Babbles Schwartz is as secure as they are
insecure. Opposite ends of the spectrum and this disturbs them
because it makes them wonder why can't they also be happy
and secure. As you can see, dear reader, Shirley and Kat
really shouldn't criticize somebody just because they don't have
what somebody else has. It's so very immature. Shirley and Kat
are supposed to be grown-ups so why don't they try acting
like grown-ups instead of being green with envy because some
other woman has what they never will have - security in her life,
satisfaction in her religion, purpose in her goals, ethics in her
methods and integrity in her actions.

These are principles that have shaped our society and remain
at the core of our freedom and liberty. That's just plain common
sense. Why do Shirley and Kat lack even rudimentary common
sense? Probably because they were indoctrinated in the liberal,
government-run, public education system. Contrast them with
Babbles who is largely self-educated. Heck, it's plain that
Babbles is more learned than the both of them put together.



Shirley and Kat want to sanctify depravity. They openly
support Halloween mask-wearing cowards interfering with the
religious freedom of others. They feel right at home in ARS where
they are in good company - for the most part a warren of hate
mongering societal rejects many of whom have criminal records.
They feel oh so brave trying to gang up on a lady who doesn't
happen to share their corrupt ways and means. On the one hand
they demand they be treated as equals to any man but, on the other
hand, they openly state that Babbles is some kind of a second or
third rate entity. They drip with hypocrisy. It's sickening.
Their "superiority" is just a case of an overactive imagination.

Regular readers of my posts probably take it for granted that my logic is impeccable because none of the anti-Scientology hate mongers have been able to refute me in honest debate. So, take my word that Shirley and Kat are partners in crime and their stand against religious freedom lacks all decency. It also lacks the specifics of courage, truthfulness, courtesy, honesty, diligence, equal treatment, loyalty and originality. From this proven evidence brought to light in their postings I would argue that Shirley and Kat's secret passion is to evoke a hateful response to the heartfelt and genuine beliefs of one of their sisters .

For shame! You can see how badly they treat 'one of their own' so is it any wonder it's the rare man who finds them other than tiresome? I might not always have good things to say about the opposite gender but you will never hear me disparage another man as long as he acts like a man. In the same way, I have little bad to say about women who act like women. However, women who try to act like spoiled boy children, and Kat and Shirley are among these, I find tedious and in need of a lengthy timeout standing face-in in some dark corner.

To summarize consider the fact that Shirley and Kat don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate religious group of people. They DO represent a tautology - femiNazis repeated over and over again. They're just flat adversarial because they are contrary to their own gender.

Let's pray they repent of their evil ways.

--
Gregory Hall

Honest Abe thinks I'm a Scientologist

"Honest Abe" wrote in message
news:Q%0Ml.199048$4m1.43929@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

Greg, you have claimed to be a Christian, and I have
pointed out to you that in L. Ron Hubbard's teachings
on "OT3" he completely invalidates Jesus Christ and
Christianity. You have obviously ignored this fact, and
you go on supporting Hubbard and his teachings, thereby
supporting his anti-Christian teachings. You claim
regarding me and the others you listed that: "They only
wish to smear and defame - - with their lies and
defamation." Yet you do not think Scientology's
anti-Christian teachings are lies and defamation?

I replied:

Sorry, but I tend to disbelieve any so-called evidence
you anti-Scientology extremists cite in your posts.
With Babbles Schwartz's help pointing out the truth
it seems like what you folks cite is either lies or taken
out of context. I have not seen any text from the CoS
that says it's against Scientology to believe in Christ.
Any text published by extremist hate groups is suspect.

Honest Abe wrote:

I can only conclude that you are not what you
claimed you are, a Christian, but that you are a
Scientologist assigned to post pro-scientology
information to this newsgroup and to smear and
defame all that disagree. Consider your cover blown!

I replied to this nonsense:

You are free to believe what you will. And I tend to
shy away from discussing Christianity here in ARS
because it's not really on topic in and of itself. Only
Christianity's relationship to Scientology is on topic,
IMO. I have found that one of the fastest way to get
non-Christians to close their minds is to preach at them
all the time.

Rather than jump to conclusions about my being a
Scientologist defending Scientology, why not look at it
objectively. I am a Christian pointing out how one side
hates and defames the other side who practices its religion
as it sees fit.


If you haters can work to destroy a particular religion you
will not stop should you succeed. You will continue on to
the next religion you label a cult. You will not stop because
you have as your true agenda the destruction of all religions.
You are atheists and agnostics and some of you, I would
guess, are devil worshipers.

This is why I side with Scientology. I work against those
who would try to get a toe hold whereby they can attempt
to destroy all religious freedom, mine included.

Honest Abe wrote:

I am not against, in fact I support, any and all practices
that can and do better mankind - especially psychologically,
as when it comes to matters of the mind we are still pretty
much in the dark ages. I got into Scientology and similar
practices for that reason - enlightenment and evolution.

I became highly disillusioned with Scientology - far more
so than any other of the several deceptive and even
destructive cults I encountered along my path. I hope you
wake up before they make you penniless, brainwashed,
and a virtual slave to their autocratic organization. I got
out in time to salvage my life, and all should. Take what
gains you can, and then free yourself! And in your future
quests for truth, I'd advise you to look to science, and
avoid all "religion" like the plague.

I replied:

Disillusionment is something many people face. But, most
people don't turn their disillusionment into works of hate.
You and others should not see being disillusioned as a
failure of the system but as a personal choice. It is but
a choice you have made for yourself because you did not
appreciate what you learned about something. In other
words your expectations were dashed. If it was a correct
choice then be happy with it. That you continue trying to
justify it by lashing out and hating that which you decided
to be disillusioned with is not a mature course of action.
It smacks of hypocrisy. It's not anybody's or any
organization's fault your choice is what is is.

And, don't worry about me. I haven't given one thin dime
to Scientology. I'm even going to check out books from the
library so they aren't even selling me a book.

--
Gregory Hall