Some Wash Out

"Ball of Fluff" <getoffmyass@fluffentology.com> wrote in message news:-8adnekqhI2x9m3UnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@posted.internetamerica...

> Sure. To me, the biggest problem is the way the cult treats members and
> also the fair game ops, and so on. But the cult never wants to take ANY
> responsibility.
> Anyone who really reads the posts and webpages written by ex members who
> are telling their stories of what happened to them and is really open to
> them would be struck by the similarities- these things are obviously true,
> repetitive and abusive. Plus, any long time Scn'ist should be able to
> recognize some names eventually and be able to maybe verify some of the
> information being related by exes. So if after all that, someone didn't
> believe all that, they'd either have to truly have their heads in the sand
> or be an OSA staff member or something of the sort where they're one of
> the ones dedicated to perpetrating such abuses.
> Very sad.

What's very sad to any unbiased, intelligent onlooker is the following: It always takes two to tango.

The small, vocal group of whining, crying ex-Scientologists, almost to the individual, has a bone to pick with Scientology mostly because they're ashamed they didn't have what it takes to stay the course. So they weren't Scientology qualified? They weren't the first and they won't be the last. Not everybody has what it takes.

You washouts should live with that fact and accept it and stop your insufferable complaining. It's all a pretense just to keep you from having to admit you couldn't cut the mustard. Instead of accepting that you failed and moving on with your lives in a positive, constructive manner by pursuing something more suited to your menial mentality and at which you can succeed, you failures who whine and complain choose to adopt a negative, immature, destructive stance and many of you have turned into extremist hate mongers who, because of your obvious sociopathy, have your own page on Religious Freedom Watch:

http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/

To me and other thinkers, the valid conclusion to draw is the Church of Scientology was correct and looking after its own interests when telling you unqualified individuals to hit the road. Scientologists certainly don't need suppressives and subversives in their ranks and it would be counter productive to retain such as these.

The fact that you now actively work against the church and are incapable of seeing your own failure indicates to me that you would have done the very same thing inside the church. You would have been a dangerous liability. A leopard cannot change its spots
even with advanced Scientology methods unless it truly wants to do so. Some diseased minds are so far gone they cannot be cured even with Dianetics. When there's nothing there to work with failure is inevitable.

Actually, I see it as a positive that the church drums out such defective thetans. If I were a high-ranking Sea Org OT aboard the "Freewinds" I would make such unqualifieds walk the plank in a formal ceremony. But, I would show them some mercy and do it while anchored close to shore so they'd be able to swim to shore and not have their lives put at risk. That swim to shore would do them good. It would be a chance for them to reflect upon the fact that they didn't have what it takes to be a part of an elite organization. This would also hold true for the mustered crew. They would use the opportunity to be thankful while reflecting upon their good standing in the church.

--
Gregory Hall